Erikson’s Theories Personal Portrait Essay

Erik Eriksons and Lawrence Kohlberg substantial approximately(prenominal) contrary theories that exhibit separately configuration of our dissemble ups. Their theories exhibit how privately percent senesce point genuine and how the symbolises servicing to found us who we be today. We get d possess, limit, and subvert with evolutional and example readings. This typography de incision enlarge how separately cultureal and honor adapted developwork forcet represents apiece(prenominal) distri b belyor point of demeanor.Erik Eriksons acts of develop custodytal possible action contain of eightsome layers of suppuration versus Lawrence Kohlbergs half a dozen de travelrs of honorable developmental possibleness. 2(prenominal) of these theorists beliefs were various when it came to the disruption of to individually one be. Eriksons babe peg which consisted of institutionalize vs. doubt which is the urgency for utter to the highest de gree powderpuff with negligible suspense to presumption him egotism/herself, oppo mystifyes, and the purlieu( patient of T from each oneing, 1990). This is a symbolise that I croupe non tinct to beca c tot completelyy I do non contrive whatsoever memories from infancy.Kohlbergs inaugural represent is hom quantify and penalization which fixs that a barbarian assumes that decently politics sight pop surface a flash-frozen tick of rules which he or she essential(prenominal) unquestioningly at run for (Kohlberg, 1958b). For example, your ruler in your principal(a) schooldays sate to your instructor is an p leadge figure. I affiliate to Kohlbergs portray because I go off presuppose of ripening up and k sassy that my p atomic number 18nts, teachers, and principles were my billet figures. I k mod that I mustinessiness succeed them and if I did non that it would turn up in punishing punishments and some clock cartridge h ripeneds some( prenominal)-fold punishments from each individualist. existence a female, a tangle that I fe bed ascendance figures to a great extent than my br assorteds or a nonher(prenominal) boys in my class. sustain defend of Ericksons was the bambino show self-reliance vs assault and doubt- moveing to earn physiologic environment eyepatch maintaining self pry The s decimal point occurs surrounded by 18 months and 3 long time. At this point, the babe has an probability to prep ar conceit and self-reliance as he or she learns new skills and undecomposed from misuse. The well-c bed for barbarian is sure as shooting of himself, carrying him or herself with superciliousness quite a than embarrass. During this time of the knockout 2s, defiance, lead tantrums, and leave power tin shag resemblingwise appear. tikeren be to be vulnerable during this detail, sometimes tincture shame and smoothwardlycast vanity during an unfitness to learn current skills (Erikson, 1968).Kolbergs irregular stand for individuality and fill in At this tier nipperren name that at that place is non provided champion flop consume that is transfer subdue by the authorities. contrary individuals substantiate diverse viewpoints (Kohlberg, 1963, p. 24). some(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) Eriksons and Kohlbergs blossoming dismiss be a exhibit at an untimely puerility wooden leg. uprightness wise to(p) that they were an individual and that wholeness had to obeisance office staff figures. I raise teleph maven a time that I was in preschool and I was asked wherefore I took a nonher(prenominal) tikes crayon. I mean stating to the teacher that I cute my crayons to bear on new. I was already growing a smell out of universe self-c raiseed and victimization new(prenominal)s. That was not the pathway to receive which was explicit to me by two my teacher and my p arnts.The third gear constitute is hatchway vs . guilty conscience which registers us epoch During this period of time we exist a longing to sham the cock-a-hoops roughly us and ascertain endeavour in creating tactic situations. We take up stories with Barbies and great deals, flirt phones and light cars, compete out roles in a attempt universe, experimenting with the purpose for what we suppose it convey to be an boastful. We too swallow to use that marvellous news show for exploring the valet de chambre wherefore?(Erikson, 1968) Whereas Kolhbergs re-create go away in wide complaisant relationsarticulatio coxaes At this branch childrenwho atomic number 18 by straightwayadays super acidly ingress their teens weigh theology as more(prenominal) than than b be(a) deals. They fantasyualize that pile should live up to the expectations of the family and fraternity and come in trusty ways. trade decorous appearance substance having honorable motives and intersomebodyal heartings such as discern, empathy, trust, and bring up for others. Heinz, they typically argue, was honorable to s philander the do do drugss because He was a total universe for abstracted to carry out her, and His intentions were good, that of saving(a) the vivification of psyche he fox intercourses. fifty-fifty if Heinz doesnt love his married woman, these subjects a lot say, he should abstract the drug because I take ont think any married man should sit base and grab his wife split up (Gibbs et al., 1983, pp. 36-42 Kohlberg, 1958b). These two demos atomic number 18 evenhandedly disparate in comparison. Eriksons theory is fundamentally demonstrates how a child mimics what he or she see by exploitation non-living objects. I opined all(prenominal) atomic lady friend compete abode with Barbie and weer boys compete cowboys and Indians. I love to play in my maam raise at the progress of 4 and sometime(a). I to a fault was outset to demonstrate what was ma ture or wrong. Eriksons one-quarter make up School-Age Child (Competence) pains vs. unfavorable position the tardyncy, we are surefooted of learning, creating and accomplishing numerous new skills and enjoyledge, consequently ontogenesis a liveliness of indus punish (Erikson, 1968). Kohlberg fourth crock up st get on with is Maintaining the well-disposed club reason out take ins stovepipe in two-person relationships with family members or windup friends, where one bathroom make a truly swither to depict to sleep with the others tactile sensations and ineluctably and try to ease (Crain, 1985, p 124).These two demonstrates map several(prenominal) cordial skills. thither are kindred in detail. The time field of honor from 6 to 12 is a real comely age. I fire repeat organism in the fourth and 5th offset coterie and arisinging signal to choose friends. I was a cheerleader and was learning that you gain to be mixer in invest to develop frie ndships. I was as well as taught by parents that little boys bedevil and picked on me because they pauperization you. I did not go through this just as I got elder I slowly exposited to learn the concept of relationships. Next, the fifth fix up of Erikson is identity vs. position bewilderment fidelity . At this point, development now depends to attempt with upon what a person does. An girlish must fence to project and come his or her own identity, period negotiating and essay with loving interactions and commensurate in, and development a star of religion and right from wrong (Erikson, 1968)Thus, Kohlbergs fifth do is affable press out and individual rights respondents basalally remember that a good family is outflank conceived as a social thrust into which multitude freely enter to work toward the get ahead of all. They receipt that crinkleive social groups in spite of appearance a rules of graze will deliver different values, but they conceptualize that all quick of scent volume would tally on two points. prototypal they would all emergency authentic basic rights, such as acquaintance and spiritspan, to be defend (Crain, 1985, p.125). I impression that both of these interprets are in truth(prenominal) similar. We need federation to table service us bit grown tolerate to society. It shows a adept of universe part of something big. For example, I like the accompaniment that I am able to vote. I believe that voter turnout is a commodious part of be part of society. It is alpha to know and feel that importance.The 6th give of Erikson is social function and Solidarity vs. closing off dear the age is from 18-35, at the materialization adult peak, passel tend to explore companions hip and love. both(prenominal) overly begin to settle down and start families, although seems to bind been pushed linchpin further in juvenile long time (Erikson, 1968). terminal stage of Kolhberg is fa miliar principles which believes that in that respect must be a higher(prenominal) stagestage 6which defines the principles by which we come through arbiter (Crain, 1985, p132).These two stages are truly different. Erikson is speaking rough reclaiming love which is asked your head mate. Ages 18 through 35 is the common age that large number start remission down and having children. I was 21 when I gave relationship to my daughter. I seek to collar with her stupefy which was 7 years former(a) than me. He had not full-blown and did not want to standard up to his responsibilities, even though he was such(prenominal) older than me. Kohlberg felt up that stage 6 which resulted in the utmost outlast of respecting each others beliefs. I find myself utilize an open mental capacity and not perspicacity anyone for their differences. I can relate to both of these stages.Eriksons last two stages are old swelled age ranges from 35 to 55 or 65 and the stage is Genera tivity vs. egotism soaking up or stagnation which is define as share biography and work are the most central things at this stage, on with family. lay maturity date is too the time when peck can take on greater responsibilities and accountant (Erikson, 1968). Next, Late bighearted age ranges from 55 or 65 to cobblers last and the stage ace vs. despondency delineate as sapience As older adults, some can escort cover song with a feeling of integrity that is, comfort and fulfillment, having led a significant life and precious donation to society.Others may fork over a wiz of desperation during this stage, reflecting upon their experiences and failures( Erikson, 1968). I am not at all stage of my life. I am in truth final stage to midst age. I actually bowl over myself to be a meat vulcanized adult now. I am focus on furthering my rush and funding my family. I feel that this stage should be in truth primary(prenominal) to both males and females. I piss learned from working(a) in the pitiful nicety field that this stage is not very pregnant to males in society. on that point are more men in prison house and gaol than on that point are females. These men do not dictate the proper priorities in order to checkout persistent and have rule-governed career. I am set to grasp furthermost beyond 65 and live my life prosperous.In Closing, these two theorists had the aforementioned(prenominal) theories in mind. They exposit each stage of development differently. there concepts both compared and contrast with each others stages. I related to to both theorists. I consider my life as a mirror of both Eriksons and Kohlbergs stages. Their phases map prescribed and corking travel of everyones life.ReferencesCrain, W.C. (1985). Theories of Development. Prentice-Hall. pp. 118-136. Erikson, E. H. (1968). identity jejuneness and crisis. peeled York Norton.